If B enters A's property to draw gravel for a specific purpose, what happens if B uses the land for another purpose?

In this scenario, B's entry onto A's property is specifically limited to the purpose of drawing gravel. When B uses the land for a different purpose, this constitutes a deviation from the original permission granted by A. In the context of property law and torts, this unauthorized alteration of the intended use translates to a trespass.

Trespass is defined as the act of entering someone's land without permission or exceeding the scope of permissible activity. Since B was allowed to enter solely for the purpose of drawing gravel, any other activity not agreed upon by A would infringe upon A's property rights, resulting in trespass.

To further contextualize the choices: if B were just continuing to gather gravel as initially permitted, that would be acceptable. However, applying the original permission to a different use disregards the limits set by A. The other options suggest scenarios that do not accurately reflect the legal implications of B's actions once the specified purpose is not followed, reinforcing why impossibility or prior permissions do not protect against trespass when the agreed-upon terms are breached.