Which of the following describes the nature of negligent infliction of emotional harm?

Negligent infliction of emotional harm refers to a scenario where an individual suffers emotional distress as a result of someone else's negligent conduct, without the necessity of a physical injury. The key element in this tort is that the conduct must be of such a nature that it is especially likely to cause serious emotional distress to a person of ordinary sensitivity. This means that the situation or behavior must reach a certain level of negligence, demonstrating that the defendant's actions were so unreasonable that emotional harm could be anticipated.

In this context, it is important to note that while the emotional distress might be severe, the claim focuses primarily on the nature of the conduct and its capacity to inflict emotional harm, rather than on direct physical injury to a person. Options that imply a requirement for physical injury, limitations to specific contexts like workplace accidents, or a blanket necessity for lawsuits do not encapsulate the full scope of negligent infliction of emotional harm as this legal concept allows for flexibility in how emotional distress can be exhibited and pursued under the law.